Originally posted by Ram040506
View Post
I do believe that the conference is better than people believe. It's just that most of the schools in it have smaller fanbases and there tends to be a bit more parity in the upper third of the league. People generally believe that means the league sucks. I think it just means there's little separation amongst the bulk of the conference. I like to think that's a good thing. But I'm also in the shrinking group of college football fans that doesn't want to see the same teams playing a third or fourth time in the CFP.
I mostly struggle with the media obsession with the B1G and SEC. I understand the "why" component of that conversation, but regardless, it's nauseating. I think the top half of the SEC is clearly the best top half of any of the conferences - and it's fine to suggest that. But for the media to portray to fans that there are not bad teams competing in either of those leagues is derelict of duty. They are just being told to prop up those two leagues because they have the biggest fan bases, followings, and brand appeals. TV ratings doesn't equate to interesting football to me. As I said, if VT getting better can help to change the outside perception of the league, then I think it's a net positive.
Leave a comment: