Originally posted by Columbuseer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
West Liberty Hilltopper Basketball
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
1. It's difficult to beat a good team 3 times in one season (and often WLU is playing a good team for a third time in an MEC championship). Good coaches, like Koenig, will find schemes to adjust.
2. 3 games in 3 days changes the fatigue equation a bit (and make no mistake that fatigue is usually a tool WLU likes to use against its opponents, but the 3 in 3 days structure equalizes that a bit).
3. You're often playing a team who is battling for it's playoff lives (like FSU was yesterday or NDC was two years ago). Which means those teams are digging deep for an extra gear of intensity they didn't/couldn't muster back in January.
Etc.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scrub View Post
1. It's difficult to beat a good team 3 times in one season (and often WLU is playing a good team for a third time in an MEC championship). Good coaches, like Koenig, will find schemes to adjust.
2. 3 games in 3 days changes the fatigue equation a bit (and make no mistake that fatigue is usually a tool WLU likes to use against its opponents, but the 3 in 3 days structure equalizes that a bit).
3. You're often playing a team who is battling for it's playoff lives (like FSU was yesterday or NDC was two years ago). Which means those teams are digging deep for an extra gear of intensity they didn't/couldn't muster back in January.
Etc.
I'm personally not a fan of the loaded consequences of a conference tournament. I'm more pro full season body of work rather than who gets hot for a couple days.
I'd be curious to see a 10-year analysis of the MEC and PSAC tournaments ... see how often the top seed actually wins. As we're very familiar with, the CIAA Tournament is famous for having wild cards win. The wild cards make great stories ... but often times the clock strikes midnight very quickly a week later. And, of course, a team that played well for 4 months gets bumped for a team that played well for 4 days.
The PSAC does the rotating (East / West) host sites. Not a fan of that, either. Should a team really get homecourt advantage in a conference tournament final? Probably not.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post
I'm personally not a fan of the loaded consequences of a conference tournament. I'm more pro full season body of work rather than who gets hot for a couple days.
I'd be curious to see a 10-year analysis of the MEC and PSAC tournaments ... see how often the top seed actually wins. As we're very familiar with, the CIAA Tournament is famous for having wild cards win. The wild cards make great stories ... but often times the clock strikes midnight very quickly a week later. And, of course, a team that played well for 4 months gets bumped for a team that played well for 4 days.
The PSAC does the rotating (East / West) host sites. Not a fan of that, either. Should a team really get homecourt advantage in a conference tournament final? Probably not.
I agree with you on considering the whole season. I think selection committee takes into account whole body of work. As you said, anyone can get hot for three days. I think that is why Fairmont did not move to 1 or 2 seed and why WLU moved from 4th to 3rd.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scrub View Post
1. It's difficult to beat a good team 3 times in one season (and often WLU is playing a good team for a third time in an MEC championship). Good coaches, like Koenig, will find schemes to adjust.
2. 3 games in 3 days changes the fatigue equation a bit (and make no mistake that fatigue is usually a tool WLU likes to use against its opponents, but the 3 in 3 days structure equalizes that a bit).
3. You're often playing a team who is battling for it's playoff lives (like FSU was yesterday or NDC was two years ago). Which means those teams are digging deep for an extra gear of intensity they didn't/couldn't muster back in January.
Etc.
To my surprise, some data analytics wonks recently claimed that it is not harder to beat a team 3 times in a season. I always thought it was harder.
Losing Will, a 1st team all conference performer, caused the minutes to go up during this 3 game, 3 day tourney and increased the fatigue. We also lose a decent 6-5 defender who can contest shots with his jumping ability.
As you said, Fairmont had to win to make the tourney. They also had a great game plan - they were purposely leaving our worst 3 point shooters wide open while denying our 3 best three point shooters. Thankfully, our open guys hit shots, or it could have been ugly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Columbuseer View Post
Scrub,
To my surprise, some data analytics wonks recently claimed that it is not harder to beat a team 3 times in a season. I always thought it was harder.
Losing Will, a 1st team all conference performer, caused the minutes to go up during this 3 game, 3 day tourney and increased the fatigue. We also lose a decent 6-5 defender who can contest shots with his jumping ability.
As you said, Fairmont had to win to make the tourney. They also had a great game plan - they were purposely leaving our worst 3 point shooters wide open while denying our 3 best three point shooters. Thankfully, our open guys hit shots, or it could have been ugly.
As for Fairmont leaving our "bad" shooter open, we saw what Dyer is capable of when freed to take his shot. 5-11 (.454) from 3 and finished with 24 points! He's a perfect example of only having one ball. WLU has really only needed him to distribute handle the ball and call the right play in the half court game...things he is clearly capable of doing. But the shooting load was not his to bear. Clearly he is more than capable of handling part of the shooting load when needed. I don't necessarily want him taking 11 three tries every game, but 5 or 6 a game for the rest of the season would be good to see.Last edited by boatcapt; 03-08-2021, 09:35 AM.
Comment
-
They run the 1-2-1-1 trap on almost every possession. Couple of reasons I think they do this. First, they are trying to get the quick turnover but they are also trying to force the opposing team into a quick game tempo which plays into their hand. I do think they were a little slow in the back end D yesterday. The defender at midcourt seemed to be slow dropping back when Fairmont got a pass into the front court leaving a number of 2 on 1 chances.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Columbuseer View Post
As you said, Fairmont had to win to make the tourney. They also had a great game plan - they were purposely leaving our worst 3 point shooters wide open while denying our 3 best three point shooters. Thankfully, our open guys hit shots, or it could have been ugly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post
I questioned that two years ago when WL got beat up by Mercyhurst. I was at the game. The press was useless in that game and it seemed to do nothing but tire out West Liberty.
If teams are starting to figure out the antidote, Howlett will have to add a wrinkle or two to keep it effective.
Comment
Ad3
Collapse
Comment