Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Iup basketball

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ship69
    replied
    Well, have watched eight minutes of brick city between UPJ and Frostburg after tuning in to view a little of the IUP-St. Thomas Aquinas game. UPJ and Frostburg are now in OT. Guess one of them will win eventually.

    Leave a comment:


  • boatcapt
    replied
    Originally posted by Ship69 View Post

    Yeah, Frostburg's hoops does not appear to be on a par with their football at this point. Ship put up a lot of points on them in a scrimmage, and three PSAC teams have spanked them during the regular season so far. They are 1-4 after a close win over West Virginia Wesleyan.
    Dare I say it? They are a tomato can!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ship69
    replied
    Originally posted by boatcapt View Post

    St Thomas is good but Frostburg is not so at worst, you should come out of the weekend with one win.
    Yeah, Frostburg's hoops does not appear to be on a par with their football at this point. Ship put up a lot of points on them in a scrimmage, and three PSAC teams have spanked them during the regular season so far. They are 1-4 after a close win over West Virginia Wesleyan.

    Leave a comment:


  • boatcapt
    replied
    Originally posted by Chuck Norris View Post
    Well, they’ve had 9 days to figure something out. Of course I’m talking about both IUP’s team and those in charge of the webcast. St Thomas is formidable. How many players get meaningful minutes? 6? 5? 4?
    St Thomas is good but Frostburg is not so at worst, you should come out of the weekend with one win.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPalum
    replied
    Originally posted by Chuck Norris View Post
    Well, they’ve had 9 days to figure something out. Of course I’m talking about both IUP’s team and those in charge of the webcast. St Thomas is formidable. How many players get meaningful minutes? 6? 5? 4?
    Joe has pissed off the fanbase with this KJ garbage. Six guys get real minutes and KJ is one of those six. KJ's minutes are when opponents tee off! Notice how this board has been silent for 8 days. This isn't normal with Joe teams.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chuck Norris
    replied
    Well, they’ve had 9 days to figure something out. Of course I’m talking about both IUP’s team and those in charge of the webcast. St Thomas is formidable. How many players get meaningful minutes? 6? 5? 4?

    Leave a comment:


  • IUP24
    replied
    Originally posted by Chuck Norris View Post

    The top four guys are excellent players and absolutely should continue to improve in their increased roles. My question is, did Joe shrink his bench last night because he knew Walsh was very good or has he already lost faith in everybody else? If it’s the latter, that’s an issue. The season’s not lost. I don’t think they’ll play too many more teams as good as Walsh. And four top notch players can carry a team a long way, we’ve seen as few as two do it in the past. I just wonder what their legs will be like by February if they continue to get no help at all.
    I think the answer to either of those questions are concerning. There's no situation that should result in him only playing 6 guys for most of the night. Having no faith in his bench, or just thinking those 6 give him the best chance. I'm not sure it matters.

    If, in fact, he has lost total faith in his bench, he's the one brining those players in. Not to mention that 1-2 of those guys get sent to Siberia every season for no apparent reason. If he just thinks running the same 6 out there is his best bet, I question his coaching and decision making at this point. Talent aside, the argument can be made that having fresh bodies makes everyone better.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chuck Norris
    replied
    Originally posted by ironmaniup View Post
    You guys are being too negative. The team has a lot of potential, some things to sort out. DD took a big step forward last night. Clarke is getting to know how to run the offense better, shooting was much improved. It will keep getting better, how much, we’ll see. . It will be interesting to watch a team that doesn’t peak during the exhibition games.
    The top four guys are excellent players and absolutely should continue to improve in their increased roles. My question is, did Joe shrink his bench last night because he knew Walsh was very good or has he already lost faith in everybody else? If it’s the latter, that’s an issue. The season’s not lost. I don’t think they’ll play too many more teams as good as Walsh. And four top notch players can carry a team a long way, we’ve seen as few as two do it in the past. I just wonder what their legs will be like by February if they continue to get no help at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • ironmaniup
    replied
    You guys are being too negative. The team has a lot of potential, some things to sort out. DD took a big step forward last night. Clarke is getting to know how to run the offense better, shooting was much improved. It will keep getting better, how much, we’ll see. . It will be interesting to watch a team that doesn’t peak during the exhibition games.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUP24
    replied
    Originally posted by TheMadLibs View Post

    That may be the funniest, richest excuse I've heard. 5 players "returning," new coach and staff, 9 new freshmen and transfers, and even if two of the games were against lesser competitors, Gannon has looked at least like their coaching staff has some gameplan to bring them together playing as a unit. Joe? Looks old.
    Joe has been horrid. He's managed his roster and bench questionably for a long time now. He's not cut out to re-recruit his team every year and rebuild an entire team annually through the portal. That's not in his DNA and it's not the game he grew up in. That's just the reality.

    To the point above, if they didn't lose Tomiwa (by many accounts because of how Joe utilized him), the returners they had would've been a good unit. Dillard and Stewart, while they may be good players, probably aren't cut out to be THE guy. IUP hasn't had any turnover like this since after maybe the 2018 season.
    I think their 2015-2016 team was probably a better team that had more talent, but some of the issues there are similar here. Brandon Norfleet was uber talented, but he wasn't the alpha or the dawg that Devante Chance was in the years prior. I think you can say the same for their guards now versus Jones and Morris. The difference though, is that was 7-8 years ago and Joe isn't the same coach he was then.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPbigINDIANS
    replied
    Originally posted by TheMadLibs View Post

    That may be the funniest, richest excuse I've heard. 5 players "returning," new coach and staff, 9 new freshmen and transfers, and even if two of the games were against lesser competitors, Gannon has looked at least like their coaching staff has some gameplan to bring them together playing as a unit. Joe? Looks old.
    Joe is coaching like he's in the twilight. It was coming. We all knew it.
    Last edited by IUPbigINDIANS; 11-17-2023, 05:22 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheMadLibs
    replied
    Originally posted by IUP24 View Post
    All that said, they had far too much turnover, way too many new faces, and far too many unknowns. I'm not suggesting their season is "over," but I'm just not convinced this is a good team. I don't think they are particularly well coached right now either.
    That may be the funniest, richest excuse I've heard. 5 players "returning," new coach and staff, 9 new freshmen and transfers, and even if two of the games were against lesser competitors, Gannon has looked at least like their coaching staff has some gameplan to bring them together playing as a unit. Joe? Looks old.

    Leave a comment:


  • bballfan03
    replied
    So who is this Rhodes guy (dad) that Joe is appeasing?

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPbigINDIANS
    replied
    Originally posted by Chuck Norris View Post

    Tomiwa as the alpha dog with Clarke, Stewart, Dillard and Ethan would’ve been a nasty starting 5. I think you’d get more out of a guy like Petteno in 12-15 minutes a night coming in strictly as a sniper. That guy has no business playing 35 minutes like he did tonight.

    As it is you have 4 very good players, none of whom are really cut out to be “the man” and then a whole bunch of nothing. Or at least that what it seems like, as Joe has completely given up on his bench.
    How bad can the 6'9", 235 lb Romero-Sanz be if he can't even play on this trainwreck?


    Trick question, of course. Nobody knows. I know one thing, he can't be any worse.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chuck Norris
    replied
    Originally posted by IUP24 View Post
    We were told addition by subtraction. I don't want anyone to tell me that Kyle Polce or Jaheim Bathea couldn't play on this team. People were saying Bathea was one of Joe's best high school recruits he ever landed.

    I know the loss of Tomiwa was significant. So too was the scoring ability of Dave Morris and Shawndale. Although Jones had some baggage to his game.

    All that said, they had far too much turnover, way too many new faces, and far too many unknowns. I'm not suggesting their season is "over," but I'm just not convinced this is a good team. I don't think they are particularly well coached right now either.
    Tomiwa as the alpha dog with Clarke, Stewart, Dillard and Ethan would’ve been a nasty starting 5. I think you’d get more out of a guy like Petteno in 12-15 minutes a night coming in strictly as a sniper. That guy has no business playing 35 minutes like he did tonight.

    As it is you have 4 very good players, none of whom are really cut out to be “the man” and then a whole bunch of nothing. Or at least that what it seems like, as Joe has completely given up on his bench.

    Leave a comment:

Ad3

Collapse
Working...
X