Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PASSHE Institutions Merging

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post
    Watching this BOG meeting, the chancellor presented that to date 299 comments have been left on the PASSHE Public Comment page. Of the 299, 229 were dismissed as "viewpoint comments about the plan, approach, etc." This means no matter how unpopular the public groundswell is, only the legislature can stop it now.
    Yep. This turned into a big PR thing for the Integration. Some of the BOG members are speaking and it sounds like they feel this is 'historic' and a good thing in general.

    So to summarize, they took 299 probably highly negative comments. Dismissed a bunch. Cherry picked some and summarized how they were dealing witht he concern.

    As for the negative comments - I put some in about how the timeframe is unrealistic to implement this and some other feedback. I guess those were in the pile that were dismissed.

    ie...I'd say this is a done deal that the BOG approves this. They seemed to speak glowingly about the process.

    Was there anything on the NCAA? I didn't catch it, but I had a call for a few minutes.
    Last edited by complaint_hopeful; 05-26-2021, 08:07 AM.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by complaint_hopeful View Post

      Yep. This turned into a big PR thing for the Integration. Some of the BOG members are speaking and it sounds like they feel this is 'historic' and a good thing in general.

      So to summarize, they took 299 probably highly negative comments. Dismissed a bunch. Cherry picked some and summarized how they were dealing witht he concern.

      As for the negative comments - I put some in about how the timeframe is unrealistic to implement this and some other feedback. I guess those were in the pile that were dismissed.

      ie...I'd say this is a done deal that the BOG approves this. They seemed to speak glowingly about the process.

      Was there anything on the NCAA? I didn't catch it, but I had a call for a few minutes.
      A lot of costs in higher ed are based on scale. The bigger the size the more something costs. For managers, they're now jockeying to be the one final *insert title* at the new university that is 2.5 times the size of their current school. The interim president already got a $75k raise for covering Edinboro - I imagine she'll get Driscoll money when its all said and done. I didn't catch anything on the NCAA and to be honest, this decision is probably not even a blip on the radar of anyone at the NCAA. It should - a wave of consolidations are coming.

      For those who live in the area - how has athletics gone with the Thomas Jefferson/Philadelphia University merger? With Georgia Souther/Armstrong State they just cut all sports from Armstrong.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by complaint_hopeful View Post
        He said of the 299 comments, 90% or so are opinions. About 10% (of overall) are actionable.
        That he said that is pretty shocking. It's disrespectful. It's dismissive of the views of the general public. Don't be manipulated by this guy.

        The purpose of a comment period is to get feedback from the public, AKA "opinions." The purpose of that 60 day comment period is NOT to obtain actionable policy ideas from the public. that's the job of the policymakers. Hello?

        What he's doing now is distraction. What is germane about the comments is how many support the plan and how many oppose it, or question it. He doesn't want to address that. He's not going to confront the idea that it's unpopular. That would mean his defeat and put a crimp in his career objectives.

        It's apparent that this guy is going to try to jam this down the throats of Pennsylvanians, regardless of anything anybody else says.

        For beginners, the whole thing is no good without a decision fro the NCAA and I don't think that is forthcoming. I really do think it is going to be a disaster. With the money and energy already spent on it, it already is a disaster. Especially for the schools in the West.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post

          That he said that is pretty shocking. It's disrespectful. It's dismissive of the views of the general public. Don't be manipulated by this guy.

          The purpose of a comment period is to get feedback from the public, AKA "opinions." The purpose of that 60 day comment period is NOT to obtain actionable policy ideas from the public. that's the job of the policymakers. Hello?

          What he's doing now is distraction. What is germane about the comments is how many support the plan and how many oppose it, or question it. He doesn't want to address that. He's not going to confront the idea that it's unpopular. That would mean his defeat and put a crimp in his career objectives.

          It's apparent that this guy is going to try to jam this down the throats of Pennsylvanians, regardless of anything anybody else says.

          For beginners, the whole thing is no good without a decision fro the NCAA and I don't think that is forthcoming. I really do think it is going to be a disaster. With the money and energy already spent on it, it already is a disaster. Especially for the schools in the West.
          Exactly. Unfortunately the legislature is the last line of defense and they're controlled by the party who is already spinning this as holding education accountable (read: fighting back on liberals wantonly spending our money). The big media is just parroting the talking points especially 25% savings to students (the biggest falsehood of the plan).

          Comment


          • Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post

            That he said that is pretty shocking. It's disrespectful. It's dismissive of the views of the general public. Don't be manipulated by this guy.

            The purpose of a comment period is to get feedback from the public, AKA "opinions." The purpose of that 60 day comment period is NOT to obtain actionable policy ideas from the public. that's the job of the policymakers. Hello?

            What he's doing now is distraction. What is germane about the comments is how many support the plan and how many oppose it, or question it. He doesn't want to address that. He's not going to confront the idea that it's unpopular. That would mean his defeat and put a crimp in his career objectives.

            It's apparent that this guy is going to try to jam this down the throats of Pennsylvanians, regardless of anything anybody else says.

            For beginners, the whole thing is no good without a decision from the NCAA and I don't think that is forthcoming. I really do think it is going to be a disaster. With the money and energy already spent on it, it already is a disaster. Especially for the schools in the West.
            I 100% agree with you. So the comments, I have to assume were largely negative. So instead of reading them, they eliminated like 90% as non-actionable, then grouped the 10% and talked about how they were addressing them.

            The board is likely not going to vote this down. They seem to thing the Chancellor and this plan are innovative and historic. (Someone actually used the word 'historic' to describe it).

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

              Exactly. Unfortunately the legislature is the last line of defense and they're controlled by the party who is already spinning this as holding education accountable (read: fighting back on liberals wantonly spending our money). The big media is just parroting the talking points especially 25% savings to students (the biggest falsehood of the plan).
              Yeah - On the 25% savings, the schools are saying that they're going to save THEMSELVES 25% on the cost of delivering education. Not save the students 25%.

              Comment


              • Actually, if you look closely, there are outcomes for which you can make projections. It just a plan, but you can look at some details and figure out the outcome.

                I looked at the academic program array for the NE triad. What it has is certain programs that will be the home base for that major at a certain school, programs that would be online only, and programs that would be offered at all 3 schools.

                It all results in more specialization, which is an idea that has been bandied about for a long time. But what will it do to the school, its makeup, its character?

                For example, in the NE, Bloom becomes the Business school. There's a big emphasis on that. Business is a popular major at LH so that will hurt LH. No question. I sense there is politics involved in some of this. At the same time, LH becomes the HQ for the sports-related, athletics training, health-related, of course, the PA program, and Sports Administration. That goes a long way to making LH mainly a jock school, which is a rep it has had in the past. It regresses as an institution, IMO. What does that do to the image of the school, overall. Will students want to attend a more specialized version of the school? Mansfield essentially becomes the Music school. Sure, there are other majors. But they are more limited. I think that is going to reduce demand, overall. You can make a fairly reliable estimate of how many students LH loses without a campus-based Business program.

                And if LH and Mansfield are more specialized it puts them into competition with a different competitive set. Current students will be able to complete their programs where they started them but future students are going to be jostled between the 3 schools and I don't think you can assume that they will choose the triad over other schools with those conditions.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post
                  Actually, if you look closely, there are outcomes for which you can make projections. It just a plan, but you can look at some details and figure out the outcome.

                  I looked at the academic program array for the NE triad. What it has is certain programs that will be the home base for that major at a certain school, programs that would be online only, and programs that would be offered at all 3 schools.

                  It all results in more specialization, which is an idea that has been bandied about for a long time. But what will it do to the school, its makeup, its character?

                  For example, in the NE, Bloom becomes the Business school. There's a big emphasis on that. Business is a popular major at LH so that will hurt LH. No question. I sense there is politics involved in some of this. At the same time, LH becomes the HQ for the sports-related, athletics training, health-related, of course, the PA program, and Sports Administration. That goes a long way to making LH mainly a jock school, which is a rep it has had in the past. It regresses as an institution, IMO. What does that do to the image of the school, overall. Will students want to attend a more specialized version of the school? Mansfield essentially becomes the Music school. Sure, there are other majors. But they are more limited. I think that is going to reduce demand, overall. You can make a fairly reliable estimate of how many students LH loses without a campus-based Business program.

                  And if LH and Mansfield are more specialized it puts them into competition with a different competitive set. Current students will be able to complete their programs where they started them but future students are going to be jostled between the 3 schools and I don't think you can assume that they will choose the triad over other schools with those conditions.
                  All true, the other thing they are not accounting for are the students that change majors half way through a program. There are alot of potential PAs that decide business is better for them, or business majors that would rather do something in the health sciences. Alot of students really don't know for sure what they want to pursue the first couple years. How will they be able to explore this at the specialized campuses ? Then there is the chance that a weaker school essentially becomes a community college, with all but a few specialized students doing only 2 years there.

                  As far as the NCAA decision, do you think the Chancellor really cares what the NCAA will say? If the decision comes back against sports at all schools, I expect him to throw up his hands, blame the NCAA for giving him the wrong impression, or being unfair somehow, but there will be nothing he can do about it anymore, and the Triad will have just one sports program, maybe some sports located at different campuses.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ironmaniup View Post

                    All true, the other thing they are not accounting for are the students that change majors half way through a program. There are alot of potential PAs that decide business is better for them, or business majors that would rather do something in the health sciences. Alot of students really don't know for sure what they want to pursue the first couple years. How will they be able to explore this at the specialized campuses ? Then there is the chance that a weaker school essentially becomes a community college, with all but a few specialized students doing only 2 years there.

                    As far as the NCAA decision, do you think the Chancellor really cares what the NCAA will say? If the decision comes back against sports at all schools, I expect him to throw up his hands, blame the NCAA for giving him the wrong impression, or being unfair somehow, but there will be nothing he can do about it anymore, and the Triad will have just one sports program, maybe some sports located at different campuses.
                    As I understand it, there are hub campuses for a program like business...meaning that it originates from there. But, that doesn't mean that the other 2 campuses won't have in person business classes. I think it's on a case by case basis.

                    As far as the NCAA ruling...like I've said before...it's important to us on this board, but I think Academics and cost reductions are the main concerns in the Integration.

                    So yeah...if the NCAA has an unfavorable ruling against sports...they may need to adjust the org structures to get a favorable one. Like maybe you have to keep financial aid depts separate. <-- That's just a guess. But, it seems like their plan is for this to be live Aug 2022 and aren't letting anything stop them.

                    The fact that 90% of the public comments were labelled as unactionable is pretty telling.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by complaint_hopeful View Post

                      As I understand it, there are hub campuses for a program like business...meaning that it originates from there. But, that doesn't mean that the other 2 campuses won't have in person business classes. I think it's on a case by case basis.

                      As far as the NCAA ruling...like I've said before...it's important to us on this board, but I think Academics and cost reductions are the main concerns in the Integration.

                      So yeah...if the NCAA has an unfavorable ruling against sports...they may need to adjust the org structures to get a favorable one. Like maybe you have to keep financial aid depts separate. <-- That's just a guess. But, it seems like their plan is for this to be live Aug 2022 and aren't letting anything stop them.

                      The fact that 90% of the public comments were labelled as unactionable is pretty telling.
                      No, as I recall, course offerings are eliminated altogether at the non-hub schools. I can look it up later but I think it's no on-campus Business courses at LH.

                      Comment


                      • APSCUF has a screenshot of the slide about the 299 comments. I have to say, I want to be on board with the Integration. And I think some people have some valid concerns. But the Chancellor appears to be treating most concerns like they're people just fighting change. It's frustrating. People want this to succeed.

                        APSCUF Higher Education Govt. Relations on Twitter: "This is unacceptable. Act 50 outlines a public comment that can range from support/oppose to "actionable" items. To put it on the public to "fix" the plan is not how this process was outlined. The BOG should be getting totals of both those supporting or opposing." / Twitter

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post

                          No, as I recall, course offerings are eliminated altogether at the non-hub schools. I can look it up later but I think it's no on-campus Business courses at LH.
                          Could be. I actually didn't see the NE one. I only saw the West.

                          Comment


                          • So the video conference ones where people can call in with concerns...you get 2 minutes to make a comment...and PASSHE will issue replies at a later date:

                            APSCUF Higher Education Govt. Relations on Twitter: "Transparency? - ONLY 2 minutes for public comment per speaker* - Questions/comments will not be answered by PASSHE until a later date - Board of Governors members can attend "to the extent possible"" / Twitter

                            Comment


                            • Also, the results of the student survey won't be released until after the final vote. That's a big WTF too.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post
                                Also, the results of the student survey won't be released until after the final vote. That's a big WTF too.
                                I want to get behind this Integration. I really do. But, there are a bunch of things that appear shady going on. Now, whether their intent is shady...I don't know.

                                But, essentially dismissing 90% of comments is pretty huge. It kind of appears like they want to do everything they can to fast forward this to the board vote and vote it in.

                                Comment

                                Ad3

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X