Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PASSHE Institutions Merging

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fightingscot82
    replied
    That's what happened at a few schools. The universities got permission from the state to take on the debt from the foundations and got a better rate. Millersville passed off the savings to the students.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fightingscot82
    replied
    Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post
    Maybe but I think the distinction here is the functionality of the building. It's not just glitziness. I guess, in time, we'll find out.

    Plus, if the result is more students in more technical disciplines that will help the school in the rankings by attracting better academically performing students.
    I mentioned before that Cal has a new science building and Edinboro's is less than 10 years old (although a major reno/expansion not brand new). Without laying out each building its hard to say that IUP's is superior to anything other than its predecessor.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPNation
    replied
    Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

    For IUP's sake I hope I'm wrong. IUP still isn't seen as the quality school that it is and absolutely not at the value it is.

    But nearly all literature on Generation Z says they don't care about facilities. They care about cost. They were kids during the mortgage crisis and great recession. Millennials were willing to pay more to get more. Gen Z questions why something costs as much as it does if they don't understand the value. It's a big reason why everyone's new expensive dorms didn't work.

    IUP has to cut the price to students. Otherwise I believe enrollment continues to plummet. I don't see IUP capitalizing on what's going on with the mergers. That's not a criticism. I think the only thing that saves PASSHE beyond the "it schools" (SRU & WCU) is figuring out how to grow the price gap between PASSHE & everyone else. Millersville has reduced its largest mandatory fee by 27% and reduced housing fee by 8%. They also tried bringing food service back in house to control costs but it proved unsuccessful.

    Leave a comment:


  • iupgroundhog
    replied
    Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

    But nearly all literature on Generation Z says they don't care about facilities.
    Maybe but I think the distinction here is the functionality of the building. It's not just glitziness. I guess, in time, we'll find out.

    Plus, if the result is more students in more technical disciplines that will help the school in the rankings by attracting better academically performing students.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fightingscot82
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPNation View Post

    I thought IUP was broke. Seems like they have been taking in some serious cash. It makes my $250 donation this year for Foosball feel so sad. LOL!
    They're almost broke. I'd like to see their total debt and total reserves (cash on hand). Most of those gifts were for very specific purposes that while great don't change IUP's enrollment/financial challenge. New programs eventually cost more than the endowment returns or don't cover either the operational costs or consider the staffing necessary. A big, new building still costs a lot to operate. You also need to employ staff to keep it clean.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fightingscot82
    replied
    Originally posted by ironmaniup View Post

    You might want to check the details of the donation. BTW the state required IUP to provide about 10% of the cost of the building, which IUP did with donations instead of other sources which is uncommon for PASSHE. But a significant number of alumni made big donations, and alot of the 23 million is going to scholarships, internships, science equipment, etc. Will it make a difference in enrollment ? couldnt' hurt. People from Other PASSHE schools have told me that they saw jumps in enrollment when they added new facilities, at least for a few years. https://www.post-gazette.com/news/ed...s/201804140078
    Still doesn't cut the cost of attendance. Very rarely does an incoming freshman get to see the hard science labs during the admissions process. They might walk through the building. But they're not choosing IUP over Duquesne because of a building or science equipment. A lot of other schools have redone their science buildings without success.

    The only thing reversing IUP's significant enrollment losses is a glaring gap in cost vs competition. IUP has great academics (and some great facilities) but a below average reputation. A dozen $1 million alumni gifts doesn't change that. A $5,000 a year gap between IUP and Penn State Behrend or a $7,500 a year gap between IUP and Pitt changes that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fightingscot82
    replied
    Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post

    I disagree. I think it will. It is a superior facility and they are going to push it. If you look at the academic program changes that are being made there is a concerted effort to focus on STEM . The word will get out. It's like the KCAC of science buildings.
    For IUP's sake I hope I'm wrong. IUP still isn't seen as the quality school that it is and absolutely not at the value it is.

    But nearly all literature on Generation Z says they don't care about facilities. They care about cost. They were kids during the mortgage crisis and great recession. Millennials were willing to pay more to get more. Gen Z questions why something costs as much as it does if they don't understand the value. It's a big reason why everyone's new expensive dorms didn't work.

    IUP has to cut the price to students. Otherwise I believe enrollment continues to plummet. I don't see IUP capitalizing on what's going on with the mergers. That's not a criticism. I think the only thing that saves PASSHE beyond the "it schools" (SRU & WCU) is figuring out how to grow the price gap between PASSHE & everyone else. Millersville has reduced its largest mandatory fee by 27% and reduced housing fee by 8%. They also tried bringing food service back in house to control costs but it proved unsuccessful.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPNation
    replied
    Originally posted by ironmaniup View Post

    You might want to check the details of the donation. BTW the state required IUP to provide about 10% of the cost of the building, which IUP did with donations instead of other sources which is uncommon for PASSHE. But a significant number of alumni made big donations, and alot of the 23 million is going to scholarships, internships, science equipment, etc. Will it make a difference in enrollment ? couldnt' hurt. People from Other PASSHE schools have told me that they saw jumps in enrollment when they added new facilities, at least for a few years. https://www.post-gazette.com/news/ed...s/201804140078
    I thought IUP was broke. Seems like they have been taking in some serious cash. It makes my $250 donation this year for Foosball feel so sad. LOL!

    Leave a comment:


  • ironmaniup
    replied
    Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

    I hate to break it to you but that shiny science building won't make a difference if IUP can't convince students to attend. This generation doesn't care about facilities as much as previous ones. They care about cost and value but mostly cost. If Duquesne with their older science building is within range they'll choose Duquesne almost every time. Sorry to the Kopchicks and IUP folk. That money would have eventually come from the state and the Kopchick money could have provided full scholarships to dozens of students. Free will get more students there than brick.
    You might want to check the details of the donation. BTW the state required IUP to provide about 10% of the cost of the building, which IUP did with donations instead of other sources which is uncommon for PASSHE. But a significant number of alumni made big donations, and alot of the 23 million is going to scholarships, internships, science equipment, etc. Will it make a difference in enrollment ? couldnt' hurt. People from Other PASSHE schools have told me that they saw jumps in enrollment when they added new facilities, at least for a few years. https://www.post-gazette.com/news/ed...s/201804140078

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPNation
    replied
    Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post

    I disagree. I think it will. It is a superior facility and they are going to push it. If you look at the academic program changes that are being made there is a concerted effort to focus on STEM . The word will get out. It's like the KCAC of science buildings.
    I think it will draw better students.

    Leave a comment:


  • iupgroundhog
    replied
    Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

    I hate to break it to you but that shiny science building won't make a difference if IUP can't convince students to attend. This generation doesn't care about facilities as much as previous ones. They care about cost and value but mostly cost. If Duquesne with their older science building is within range they'll choose Duquesne almost every time. Sorry to the Kopchicks and IUP folk. That money would have eventually come from the state and the Kopchick money could have provided full scholarships to dozens of students. Free will get more students there than brick.
    I disagree. I think it will. It is a superior facility and they are going to push it. If you look at the academic program changes that are being made there is a concerted effort to focus on STEM . The word will get out. It's like the KCAC of science buildings.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPNation
    replied
    Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

    I hate to break it to you but that shiny science building won't make a difference if IUP can't convince students to attend. This generation doesn't care about facilities as much as previous ones. They care about cost and value but mostly cost. If Duquesne with their older science building is within range they'll choose Duquesne almost every time. Sorry to the Kopchicks and IUP folk. That money would have eventually come from the state and the Kopchick money could have provided full scholarships to dozens of students. Free will get more students there than brick.
    Sure go to the cheaper school, just hope employers view it in the same manner.


    Leave a comment:


  • Fightingscot82
    replied
    Originally posted by ironmaniup View Post

    There has also been a huge rearrangement - 1 less college, departments shuffled around and merged, and a few other things. For now the enrollment bleeding is stopped, with a decent size incoming class registered. Interestingly, retention was better last year than it has been for a while - but its hard to judge with all of the on-line courses. The interesting question is whether it will hold up with the fewer support people, and a full campus in fall. There's a plan, its not made everyone happy, There is alot to criticize about it, but there are good things going on. Kopchick Hall for instance - https://www.iup.edu/news-item.aspx?id=294520
    I hate to break it to you but that shiny science building won't make a difference if IUP can't convince students to attend. This generation doesn't care about facilities as much as previous ones. They care about cost and value but mostly cost. If Duquesne with their older science building is within range they'll choose Duquesne almost every time. Sorry to the Kopchicks and IUP folk. That money would have eventually come from the state and the Kopchick money could have provided full scholarships to dozens of students. Free will get more students there than brick.

    Leave a comment:


  • ironmaniup
    replied
    Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post

    However, that's just the survivalist approach. We want IUP to flourish.Kopchick hall for instance

    As a result of Trump policies, grad enrollment may have been affected. But IUP has been sustained by graduate enrollment for the past decade, The discussion is mainly about undergrad enrollment and recruitment. When I attended IUP in the late 70's and early 80's IUP's enrollment was 12, 500. And it was capped at 12, 500. The acceptance rate was good and that constantly pushed the average scores of incoming students up. Not only was IUP by far the biggest of the schools it was also the most competitive by a lot. Plus, at that time IUP had a grad school but it wasn't as big in relative terms as it is today.

    Today, IUP enrollment is hovering around 75-80% of what it was when PASSHE came into existence. Meanwhile, the rest of the schools are bigger than they were then even after counting the enrollment declines.

    Rather than focusing on mere survival, the state should look at IUP as a resource to be developed. That's actually in everybody's interest.
    There has also been a huge rearrangement - 1 less college, departments shuffled around and merged, and a few other things. For now the enrollment bleeding is stopped, with a decent size incoming class registered. Interestingly, retention was better last year than it has been for a while - but its hard to judge with all of the on-line courses. The interesting question is whether it will hold up with the fewer support people, and a full campus in fall. There's a plan, its not made everyone happy, There is alot to criticize about it, but there are good things going on. Kopchick Hall for instance - https://www.iup.edu/news-item.aspx?id=294520

    Leave a comment:


  • complaint_hopeful
    replied
    For anyone who thinks this won't be approved...from the PA budget:

    'This budget also provides $50 million in ARP funding for the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education (PASSHE) to support the redesign and growth of the system to make a college education more affordable and accessible for students. The investment is part of a commitment totaling $200 million over four years for PASSHE.'

    https://www.governor.pa.gov/newsroom...state-history/

    Leave a comment:

Ad3

Collapse
Working...
X