Originally posted by Fightingscot82
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
PASSHE Institutions Merging
Collapse
Support The Site!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ctrabs74 View Post
I seem to recall that they either dropped their NCAA membership or dropped athletics altogether as a result of the pandemic...
Comment
-
Well this certainly isn't a good look...
https://www.erienewsnow.com/clip/152...-big-pay-hikes
My faith in those running my beloved alma mater is pretty weak right now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View PostWell this certainly isn't a good look...
https://www.erienewsnow.com/clip/152...-big-pay-hikes
My faith in those running my beloved alma mater is pretty weak right now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post
There's no way that can be spun to make any sense. In a broader sense it is definitely not a good look.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post
They dropped from DII to NAIA. They played in the WVIAC from 1999 until its demise. Unsure if they migrated to MEC or joined another DII conference after.
They have had financial/enrolement problems for a number of years. They hired a new president who placed much of the blame for their financial problems at the feet of the athletic department and cut accordingly, ultimately taking them to the NAIA. Clearly...he was wrong!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by boatcapt View Post
They were part of the WVIAC non-football voting block. Their commitment to athletics, even in the best of times, was lacking. When the WVIAC fell apart they were not invited to join the MEC and eventually joined the GMAC with a number of other former WVIAC teams.
They have had financial/enrolement problems for a number of years. They hired a new president who placed much of the blame for their financial problems at the feet of the athletic department and cut accordingly, ultimately taking them to the NAIA. Clearly...he was wrong!!
Private
Enrollment under 1,000 students
Mediocre retention rates
Small endowment
Little or no reserves
Low fundraising capacity
High discount rate of sticker price
High debt level
It looks like they tried bringing in a lot of international kids (who usually have their government pay full sticker price) but when enrollment is down under 200 you're just playing a shell game with money. Parkersburg isn't an area that's going to attract many, either.
One fewer school using the Fighting Scots nickname, too!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post
They also fit the mold of schools who are outright closing:
Private
Enrollment under 1,000 students
Mediocre retention rates
Small endowment
Little or no reserves
Low fundraising capacity
High discount rate of sticker price
High debt level
It looks like they tried bringing in a lot of international kids (who usually have their government pay full sticker price) but when enrollment is down under 200 you're just playing a shell game with money. Parkersburg isn't an area that's going to attract many, either.
One fewer school using the Fighting Scots nickname, too!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post
They dropped from DII to NAIA. They played in the WVIAC from 1999 until its demise. Unsure if they migrated to MEC or joined another DII conference after.Cal U (Pa.) Class of 2014
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post
I think a college town should identify as such, and some don't. Some of the towns on this list probably don't identify as a college town or even feel like one. Does Media qualify as a college town? I'd also argue Middletown's eligibility. Edinboro for years has tried to market itself as a "resort town" almost like Conneaut Lake when people know it as a college town. Funny that State College or Lewisburg didn't make the list. Those are great college towns but I guess if it made sense we wouldn't be talking about a website called HomeSnacks.
Comment
-
Originally posted by complaint_hopeful View Post
I can't believe the policy changes required to integrate their specific areas across all 3 institutions are that great. They should be just implementing a framework like they did before except it is for 3 campuses. I doubt their jobs are going to be much different. It seems like the raises are based on elevating the administrators to VP status.
Plus, the student population they are serving has diminished to a point likely in the neighborhood for the 3 campuses that is comparable to doing the same job at one of the schools 10 years ago.
I don't think the merger is supposed to result in administrative pay raises like this. Doesn't seem justified.
Comment
-
Originally posted by iupgroundhog View Post
I guess you have to be open-minded enough to consider that these 3 salary increases could be anecdotal; however, this appears to be in opposition to the entire merger model designed to achieve cost savings. I would say if it looks like exploitation, it probably is exploitation.
I can't believe the policy changes required to integrate their specific areas across all 3 institutions are that great. They should be just implementing a framework like they did before except it is for 3 campuses. I doubt their jobs are going to be much different. It seems like the raises are based on elevating the administrators to VP status.
Plus, the student population they are serving has diminished to a point likely in the neighborhood for the 3 campuses that is comparable to doing the same job at one of the schools 10 years ago.
I don't think the merger is supposed to result in administrative pay raises like this. Doesn't seem justified.
There are also a lot of positions that can't be done across 3 campuses very well, such as alumni relations. So you end up with a model with 3 alumni directors and no cost savings.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post
That's the fallacy of administrative savings in mergers. If $100k is the market rate for a certain position at a 5,000 student school and it merges to create a 15,000 student school, while you might be able to eliminate two $100k positions, that third person can now argue they should be paid the market rate for a 15,000 student school.
There are also a lot of positions that can't be done across 3 campuses very well, such as alumni relations. So you end up with a model with 3 alumni directors and no cost savings.
Overall, Integrating is very expensive. It's hard to really see areas of savings.
Comment
-
Originally posted by complaint_hopeful View Post
Yes - And the Chancellor even says the Integrations weren't for cost savings. They're to expand student access to programs, etc.
Comment
Ad3
Collapse
Comment