THE IUP Football Thread

[Fightingscot82]

But has anyone asked the IUP AD? There has to be some facility plan for it's upkeep.

The Centre County Community College still has it's 65 year old erector set of a stadium intact with it's crappy restrooms and lousy concessions.

IUP doesn't need a tear down and rebuild.

They need to get rid of that ugly perimeter fence and build up the home side. Even if you don't tear down the home side stands...build up behind it with a new press box building and gut the underneath.

A nice head house entrance with a real ticket office would be nice too.

Todd is a pro. He's going to say he would take scholarship dollars over stadium dollars.

Regarding Penn State, read my post again. Football is part of Penn State's self identity. They embrace it from top to bottom. Beaver Stadium is the home of that identity. That is not the case for IUP. I think Driscoll loves IUP and is a great president for this present moment, but a guy who sees athletics (especially football) as a university brand he is not.

For a major redo of Miller, there would have to be a scion donor who cares that much about IUP football to go to the school and say they'll underwrite a good portion of it or no deal. That type of donor would be someone already known to them and who goes to enough games to notice Miller's shortcomings. I don't believe IUP has that type of person.

[IUPNation]

A project like that has to get buy-in from the AD who sells it several layers above. The fact that we've gone on so many years with the home side and larger complex untouched says that its not seen as a priority. Plus I would imagine everyone if asked would tell you they'd much rather have scholarship dollars than stadium dollars. Most D2 schools with upper level stadiums have football in their campus identity (like Grand Valley or West Texas A&M) or a scion megadonor (like Ashland or West Liberty).

But has anyone asked the IUP AD? There has to be some facility plan for it's upkeep.

The Centre County Community College still has it's 65 year old erector set of a stadium intact with it's crappy restrooms and lousy concessions.

IUP doesn't need a tear down and rebuild.

They need to get rid of that ugly perimeter fence and build up the home side. Even if you don't tear down the home side stands...build up behind it with a new press box building and gut the underneath.

A nice head house entrance with a real ticket office would be nice too.

[Fightingscot82]

It would be nice to know from Torts or the AD is there is going to be any sort of fund raising campaign to address The Cig. Harrisburg isn’t going to pay for it.

A project like that has to get buy-in from the AD who sells it several layers above. The fact that we've gone on so many years with the home side and larger complex untouched says that its not seen as a priority. Plus I would imagine everyone if asked would tell you they'd much rather have scholarship dollars than stadium dollars. Most D2 schools with upper level stadiums have football in their campus identity (like Grand Valley or West Texas A&M) or a scion megadonor (like Ashland or West Liberty).

[IUPbigINDIANS]

Yeah, it’s a shame when good ole’ taking pride in what you do and putting in hard work gets in the way. It really is impressive how well the football program has done with getting players and the consistency of winning they’ve had given the resources they’re working with. Then there are the other sports at IUP. Talk about no love. If you didn’t have a Twitter account you’d barely know they existed.

Maybe our expectations aren’t realistic.

What exactly is the sports marketing department at IUP?

To my knowledge, it is the over-run SID and several student interns.

It should be a full-time position. It would pay for itself and then some.

[EyeoftheHawk]

"I’m thinking more about PR, marketing, etc."

In many ways, marketing often requires grunt work, which too often IUP fails to do or even think about.
It also is not a one and done proces. It has to be ongoing, consistent and aggressive.
Having done this fo 50 years, it is really frustrating to see the many opportunites IUP has missed, often because they are not recognized or those in charge simply don't care. Getting out the door at 4PM or 5PM is more important.

Yeah, it’s a shame when good ole’ taking pride in what you do and putting in hard work gets in the way. It really is impressive how well the football program has done with getting players and the consistency of winning they’ve had given the resources they’re working with. Then there are the other sports at IUP. Talk about no love. If you didn’t have a Twitter account you’d barely know they existed.

Maybe our expectations aren’t realistic.

[Iupgh]

IUP really needs to up its game in terms of the “coolness” factor when it comes to bringing in top recruits and transfers. Seeing what some of these other schools at the DII and even DIII levels are doing shows how far behind IUP is. Like many of you other older folks on the board, I don’t like that you need to do that stuff to get a kid to play for you, but the reality is it matters to today’s athletes. Yes, an old school approach can work with some kids, but if you’re not blinging a kid out in a uni for a photo op, video clip, etc. these days, you’re behind. One thing IUP has is the KCAC experience, which is nice, but that doesn’t cover for the lacking facilities on the football side. So the question is, is it a budget matter or a leadership matter. Maybe a little of both? When I say leadership, I don’t mean the coaching staff by any means. Their job is to coach and sell the football program. I’m thinking more about PR, marketing, etc.

I remember when they had the “press conference” when they announced Kurt Cignetti as the new head coach and at the end they handed the guy a cheesy wrinkled tee shirt that said IUP Football on it. They would have been better off to have done nothing because it was embarrassing. Obviously that’s going back a few years but I’m not sure the way IUP athletics presents itself as a whole has gotten much better.

Can’t dress up a pig, which is what there facilities are…It amazes me year after they recruit as well as they do….If they land this Hunter kid I will be amazed again…There 2 schools in competition have elite top 5 stadiums WT and Northern state…IUP administration should be embarrassed regarding Miller Stadium and anything to do with football other that the coaches and personal…I mean really embarrassed.

[IUPNation]

IUP really needs to up its game in terms of the “coolness” factor when it comes to bringing in top recruits and transfers. Seeing what some of these other schools at the DII and even DIII levels are doing shows how far behind IUP is. Like many of you other older folks on the board, I don’t like that you need to do that stuff to get a kid to play for you, but the reality is it matters to today’s athletes. Yes, an old school approach can work with some kids, but if you’re not blinging a kid out in a uni for a photo op, video clip, etc. these days, you’re behind. One thing IUP has is the KCAC experience, which is nice, but that doesn’t cover for the lacking facilities on the football side. So the question is, is it a budget matter or a leadership matter. Maybe a little of both? When I say leadership, I don’t mean the coaching staff by any means. Their job is to coach and sell the football program. I’m thinking more about PR, marketing, etc.

I remember when they had the “press conference” when they announced Kurt Cignetti as the new head coach and at the end they handed the guy a cheesy wrinkled tee shirt that said IUP Football on it. They would have been better off to have done nothing because it was embarrassing. Obviously that’s going back a few years but I’m not sure the way IUP athletics presents itself as a whole has gotten much better.

It would be nice to know from Torts or the AD is there is going to be any sort of fund raising campaign to address The Cig. Harrisburg isn’t going to pay for it.

[Iupgh]

I don't even think it's a question that the football program takes a back seat to the men's basketball program. I've been saying that for years on here -- getting scoffed at in the earlier years but lately I think most are starting to realize it.

I'm not even talking on a success level (which Joe has had much more the past 15 years). Go to a game. They couldn't be more different. IUP football crowds are old, quiet and boring. The atmosphere at 80% of the games each year resembles a funeral home. Joe's games are totally different. It's a much younger demographic. They are way more lively, energetic, etc. The KCAC is the 'place to be' when Joe's home.

Facilities-wise, the two programs don't compare. Joe has D1 (upper half) mid-major facilities. Tort has glorified WPIAL Class 2A facilities. What they use to offset that is the history, money and Indiana itself -- which is very nice, lively D2 college town (especially compared to most). And, of course, you're going to win here.

To your point, IUP Football doesn't play up its image. The Catch 22 there is most inside the football program don't see the same 'image' that the rest of the PSAC sees -- the arrogance, flamboyant behavior, cockiness, etc. I'm not saying they need to market themselves as the 1980s Miami Hurricanes ... but it could certainly use some 'swag'.

I feel this is an old story with all due respect. Hoops is fully funded 10 schollies and plays in a top 5 national facility top 2 in region facility. In addition the 2 main state schools Rock and Cal that have comparable football programs are sub par as far as hoops is concerned regarding funding. So the competition is basically Hurst and nobody else in the region except for West Liberty. Football on the other hand plays in a bottom 20 facility nation wide , is not even close to be fully funded and can’t even play road games out of conference in order to watch there dreaded budget. The success of the football team with everything being considered is actually more impressive than what the hoops team has done….Just sayin

[GregD]

"I’m thinking more about PR, marketing, etc."

In many ways, marketing often requires grunt work, which too often IUP fails to do or even think about.
It also is not a one and done proces. It has to be ongoing, consistent and aggressive.
Having done this fo 50 years, it is really frustrating to see the many opportunites IUP has missed, often because they are not recognized or those in charge simply don't care. Getting out the door at 4PM or 5PM is more important.


.

[IUPbigINDIANS]

I think you can see the new era somewhat in what the coaching staff at Lock Haven is able to do. They are very present on social media and are fully bought in to what gets kids excited about visiting a small D2 school in central Pennsylvania. Lots of graphics, hashtags, and hype gets kids in the door even though they are such a doormat they're starting to sink into the floor. They must have hosted150 official visits this recruiting season. They started doing the monocolor lighting hype pic then everyone else in the PSAC followed suit. IUP with that amount of swagger, its performance, and history should be dominating everything. IUP should be every kid's first visit, not Cinderella giving the 11th hour offer. Every other kid in this region starts their college search with Pitt and Penn State. Every football recruit not already on the FBS train should be starting with IUP. In spite of everything they can brag about online and during visits, I think IUP football has become what men's basketball is at most other PSAC schools (#2).

I don't even think it's a question that the football program takes a back seat to the men's basketball program. I've been saying that for years on here -- getting scoffed at in the earlier years but lately I think most are starting to realize it.

I'm not even talking on a success level (which Joe has had much more the past 15 years). Go to a game. They couldn't be more different. IUP football crowds are old, quiet and boring. The atmosphere at 80% of the games each year resembles a funeral home. Joe's games are totally different. It's a much younger demographic. They are way more lively, energetic, etc. The KCAC is the 'place to be' when Joe's home.

Facilities-wise, the two programs don't compare. Joe has D1 (upper half) mid-major facilities. Tort has glorified WPIAL Class 2A facilities. What they use to offset that is the history, money and Indiana itself -- which is very nice, lively D2 college town (especially compared to most). And, of course, you're going to win here.

To your point, IUP Football doesn't play up its image. The Catch 22 there is most inside the football program don't see the same 'image' that the rest of the PSAC sees -- the arrogance, flamboyant behavior, cockiness, etc. I'm not saying they need to market themselves as the 1980s Miami Hurricanes ... but it could certainly use some 'swag'.

[Fightingscot82]

IUP really needs to up its game in terms of the “coolness” factor when it comes to bringing in top recruits and transfers. Seeing what some of these other schools at the DII and even DIII levels are doing shows how far behind IUP is. Like many of you other older folks on the board, I don’t like that you need to do that stuff to get a kid to play for you, but the reality is it matters to today’s athletes. Yes, an old school approach can work with some kids, but if you’re not blinging a kid out in a uni for a photo op, video clip, etc. these days, you’re behind. One thing IUP has is the KCAC experience, which is nice, but that doesn’t cover for the lacking facilities on the football side. So the question is, is it a budget matter or a leadership matter. Maybe a little of both? When I say leadership, I don’t mean the coaching staff by any means. Their job is to coach and sell the football program. I’m thinking more about PR, marketing, etc.

I remember when they had the “press conference” when they announced Kurt Cignetti as the new head coach and at the end they handed the guy a cheesy wrinkled tee shirt that said IUP Football on it. They would have been better off to have done nothing because it was embarrassing. Obviously that’s going back a few years but I’m not sure the way IUP athletics presents itself as a whole has gotten much better.

I think you can see the new era somewhat in what the coaching staff at Lock Haven is able to do. They are very present on social media and are fully bought in to what gets kids excited about visiting a small D2 school in central Pennsylvania. Lots of graphics, hashtags, and hype gets kids in the door even though they are such a doormat they're starting to sink into the floor. They must have hosted150 official visits this recruiting season. They started doing the monocolor lighting hype pic then everyone else in the PSAC followed suit. IUP with that amount of swagger, its performance, and history should be dominating everything. IUP should be every kid's first visit, not Cinderella giving the 11th hour offer. Every other kid in this region starts their college search with Pitt and Penn State. Every football recruit not already on the FBS train should be starting with IUP. In spite of everything they can brag about online and during visits, I think IUP football has become what men's basketball is at most other PSAC schools (#2).

[EyeoftheHawk]

IUP really needs to up its game in terms of the “coolness” factor when it comes to bringing in top recruits and transfers. Seeing what some of these other schools at the DII and even DIII levels are doing shows how far behind IUP is. Like many of you other older folks on the board, I don’t like that you need to do that stuff to get a kid to play for you, but the reality is it matters to today’s athletes. Yes, an old school approach can work with some kids, but if you’re not blinging a kid out in a uni for a photo op, video clip, etc. these days, you’re behind. One thing IUP has is the KCAC experience, which is nice, but that doesn’t cover for the lacking facilities on the football side. So the question is, is it a budget matter or a leadership matter. Maybe a little of both? When I say leadership, I don’t mean the coaching staff by any means. Their job is to coach and sell the football program. I’m thinking more about PR, marketing, etc.

I remember when they had the “press conference” when they announced Kurt Cignetti as the new head coach and at the end they handed the guy a cheesy wrinkled tee shirt that said IUP Football on it. They would have been better off to have done nothing because it was embarrassing. Obviously that’s going back a few years but I’m not sure the way IUP athletics presents itself as a whole has gotten much better.

[cwfenn]

He'd start from Day 1 here, too.

There’s a chance WT would be more run oriented than he would want-their new coach ran a lot of option at his previous jobs. IUP may be a better fit.

[iupgroundhog]

The QB market floods again after Spring Ball. Perhaps that is the Plan B.

Seems like they might have a plan B, C, D, E, and F.

[IUPbigINDIANS]

Yes, he’d be the starter at IUP out of the gate. They wouldn’t spend the type of money it would take to get him here to be a backup. If he doesn’t sign at IUP, I’m not sure what Plan B is here. Maybe they think they have a guy on the roster now that could do it if they don’t bring someone in. Spring practice is right around the corner.

The QB market floods again after Spring Ball. Perhaps that is the Plan B.