Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PASSHE Institutions Merging

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

    I agree with both of you to an extent.

    The PA GOP doesn't like to fund things and spends more time obstructing the PA Dems and parroting national GOP talking points than they do legislating. If they do its copy & paste from the Commonwealth Foundation. The PA Dems seem to just try to increase funding. If they do come up with anything novel the funding source is too novel for anyone to take seriously: a new tax, shifting funds from a previously restricted fund, etc.

    Most states have their lottery revenue fund public education, so there's a leg up in funding source. But most states also don't have the legacy state infrastructure that PA has: 121 state parks (with virtually no significant revenue streams like other states), state hospitals, etc.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

      I agree with both of you to an extent.

      The PA GOP doesn't like to fund things and spends more time obstructing the PA Dems and parroting national GOP talking points than they do legislating. If they do its copy & paste from the Commonwealth Foundation. The PA Dems seem to just try to increase funding. If they do come up with anything novel the funding source is too novel for anyone to take seriously: a new tax, shifting funds from a previously restricted fund, etc.

      Most states have their lottery revenue fund public education, so there's a leg up in funding source. But most states also don't have the legacy state infrastructure that PA has: 121 state parks (with virtually no significant revenue streams like other states), state hospitals, etc.
      That's basically my point, and you did a great job of hitting on reasons. There's been a lot of talk, but when it comes down to it...funding for PASSHE has decreased or stayed the same for 20 years. No matter who has been in power. No matter what noble intentions they may have.

      And I agree that the Dems are way more for Higher Ed, but when they've been in power...that hasn't resulted in substantial funding increases. Now at this point of the game, PA is some $330 million a year behind the average state near us. That's hard to make up!

      It is crazy to me that PA subsidizes horse racing.

      Comment


      • Why do Pitt and Penn State, etc receive so much state funding? Essentially PA subsidizes them to compete with PASSHE?

        Why don't politicians divert some of this money to PASSHE? Both Reps and Dems have been in power over the last 22 years since this dramatic cut in funding...

        Comment


        • Originally posted by complaint_hopeful View Post
          Why do Pitt and Penn State, etc receive so much state funding? Essentially PA subsidizes them to compete with PASSHE?

          Why don't politicians divert some of this money to PASSHE? Both Reps and Dems have been in power over the last 22 years since this dramatic cut in funding...
          Penn State is our land grant university. They're not going away. Pitt was private from 1787 to 1966 when the state gave them a permanent bailout from bankruptcy. Same goes for Temple and Lincoln. The idea was to alleviate the burden on Penn State and provide greater access to an R1 education. Other states have done this - Ohio took Akron, Cincinnati, Toledo, & YSU under their wings with the same rationale. I honestly don't know what the rationale was for Lincoln - maybe being the first HBCU (Cheyney is older but wasn't a college/university until later).

          The problem with Penn State & Pitt is the mission creep done through the branch campuses. Some of them - UPJ, Pitt Bradford, Penn State Erie ('Behrend'), etc are robust campuses with grad programs and NCAA athletics. They directly compete for students. There's a rumor that Penn State was going to test football at the Altoona campus in the 90s until Paterno put an end to it.

          Most of them are failing enterprises. This data is a little old and since it came from the Philly Trib it doesn't consider Pitt.

          Click image for larger version

Name:	received_437341800290042.jpg
Views:	286
Size:	54.6 KB
ID:	609357

          Comment


          • Off Topic but WPXI has reported a shooting this morning at or very close to the Cal U campus. Alleged shooter is in custody.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post
              Off Topic but WPXI has reported a shooting this morning at or very close to the Cal U campus. Alleged shooter is in custody.
              As far as I can tell in the news, a gun was fired but no one was shot. It appears to be a few blocks off campus. The articles I read say no injuries.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by IUPNation View Post

                Why are we subsidizing horse racing?
                Good question. And each race horse is subsidized to a great extent than the average Pa. college student.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

                  Penn State is our land grant university. They're not going away. Pitt was private from 1787 to 1966 when the state gave them a permanent bailout from bankruptcy. Same goes for Temple and Lincoln. The idea was to alleviate the burden on Penn State and provide greater access to an R1 education. Other states have done this - Ohio took Akron, Cincinnati, Toledo, & YSU under their wings with the same rationale. I honestly don't know what the rationale was for Lincoln - maybe being the first HBCU (Cheyney is older but wasn't a college/university until later).

                  The problem with Penn State & Pitt is the mission creep done through the branch campuses. Some of them - UPJ, Pitt Bradford, Penn State Erie ('Behrend'), etc are robust campuses with grad programs and NCAA athletics. They directly compete for students. There's a rumor that Penn State was going to test football at the Altoona campus in the 90s until Paterno put an end to it.

                  Most of them are failing enterprises. This data is a little old and since it came from the Philly Trib it doesn't consider Pitt.

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	received_437341800290042.jpg
Views:	286
Size:	54.6 KB
ID:	609357
                  Interesting stats. We always tend to hear of the declining enrollments at the PASSHE schools, but not so much at the PSU branches. I knew the Harrisburg PSU campus was one of the stronger ones. One of my grandsons got his undergrad engineering degree there. He's doing MBA work at Ship.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Ship69 View Post

                    Interesting stats. We always tend to hear of the declining enrollments at the PASSHE schools, but not so much at the PSU branches. I knew the Harrisburg PSU campus was one of the stronger ones. One of my grandsons got his undergrad engineering degree there. He's doing MBA work at Ship.
                    Pitt and Penn State are virtually shielded from public record. They're not independent non-profits so they don't have to file a 990 tax filing. But they're not state entities so they're not subject to the open records law. So the public has to rely on trustees reports, federal reporting, etc.

                    There are no secrets at PASSHE schools. Any one of us can file a RTK on what any employee says about us. Or to solve any rumor of scandal.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by IUPNation View Post

                      Why are we subsidizing horse racing?
                      It's because they have better lobbyists than PASSHE.

                      Comment


                      • Really, a lot of the PASSHE woes can be traced back to Corbett and his cuts..although state support was declining before and didn't really rise much after. Corbett took some $175 million in funding away a year.

                        That said, yes...the lobbying is a big part. PASSHE, for years did a terrible job of working with the PA Government on funding. And now, as schools fail, the politicians look at them as failing businesses...and the underfunding issue becomes politicized and not fixed.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by complaint_hopeful View Post
                          Really, a lot of the PASSHE woes can be traced back to Corbett and his cuts..although state support was declining before and didn't really rise much after. Corbett took some $175 million in funding away a year.

                          That said, yes...the lobbying is a big part. PASSHE, for years did a terrible job of working with the PA Government on funding. And now, as schools fail, the politicians look at them as failing businesses...and the underfunding issue becomes politicized and not fixed.

                          They are.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Fightingscot82 View Post

                            Pitt and Penn State are virtually shielded from public record. They're not independent non-profits so they don't have to file a 990 tax filing. But they're not state entities so they're not subject to the open records law. So the public has to rely on trustees reports, federal reporting, etc.

                            There are no secrets at PASSHE schools. Any one of us can file a RTK on what any employee says about us. Or to solve any rumor of scandal.
                            True. When the salaries of Big Ten football coaches are reported, there are two you generally don't get, Northwestern (private school) and Penn State.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post


                              They are.
                              I don't know. If you cut any of the state systems in the US funding by some $300 million, I think they won't be doing well.

                              It's like a bait and switch. The state partially funded these schools at a certain percentage, then 20 years ago started cutting that funding. We're some $300 million behind the average state around us.

                              Take $300 million off of the Ohio system and see how they're doing.

                              I do think there are inefficiencies in the schools. But I don't think it adds up to $300 million a year. And as the funding goes down, the cost for students goes up...which prices students out of going to them. It's a vicious cycle.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by complaint_hopeful View Post

                                I don't know. If you cut any of the state systems in the US funding by some $300 million, I think they won't be doing well.

                                It's like a bait and switch. The state partially funded these schools at a certain percentage, then 20 years ago started cutting that funding. We're some $300 million behind the average state around us.

                                Take $300 million off of the Ohio system and see how they're doing.

                                I do think there are inefficiencies in the schools. But I don't think it adds up to $300 million a year. And as the funding goes down, the cost for students goes up...which prices students out of going to them. It's a vicious cycle.

                                Comment

                                Ad3

                                Collapse
                                Working...
                                X