Originally posted by Chuck Norris
View Post
The differences I came up with:
Joe had several physical PGs. Chance, for example, was 5'11" but extremely physical.
His other guards in that era were also in the 6'5" range (Brandon Norfleet, etc.). It's much easier to trap 6'0" (or shorter) guards.
His post players in that era were far superior (Webb, Daddy, etc.). They were extremely more aggressive and much more physical.
Was Joe, too, a little more innovative in his younger years? Perhaps.
But, here's the other thing: Cal BEAT Gannon a week ago with (6) guys. That's it. Six players got on the floor. Danny does the 100 percent polar opposite attack than Joe does. Joe should study what Cal does against Gannon.
Millersville (a team Joe beat fairly easily) lost to Gannon, 74-70.
Gannon is good but shouldn't be embarrassing IUP (as noted in those results).
Joe has to change how he plays them. It clearly doesn't work with his current rosters and strategies.
He's had a post player issue for awhile now, which also isn't helping.
Put it this way ... they keep playing them like they did yesterday and they'd lose 50 out of 50.
Leave a comment: