Iup basketball

[IUP24]

IUP goes 1-3 in these last 4 games and misses the PSAC's. Joe better then do a little house cleaning and clean up this mess he created. Getting Dallis and Bautista added to this bunch isn't enough.

They need upgrades from Sarp and Pickens.

How does Triggs fit, if at all.

Moore, Merraro, Dallis should be the starting guards.

Grove, Brooks, Bautista... two of those 3 should start at the forwards.

I wish I could pinpoint where it all went wrong for IUP, and Joe specifically. This isn't just a team that is going through a dip. This is a terrible basketball team. The reality is that they weren't very good last year either, but they had Ethan Porterfield that bailed them out in many games. I have followed from afar this season and haven't really posted here (mostly out of frustration), but I see nothing to think this team will be tangibly better next year if the same group returns.

I think everyone knew that at the completion of the 2023 season, there was going to be a drop off. They had nearly zero turnover for 5 years and the bill simply came due on that. The replacement parts to try to retool have nearly all been abject failures. I get there has been extenuating circumstances... Clarke leaving... Injuries to key players... Eligibility issues (which is the fault of the staff in my opinion)... But that's life in the business. Those things happen to everyone.

I'll point to two things over the last few years that have happened that I think have largely contributed to where they are at:

1) A number of the high school recruits that they brought in didn't work out. There's probably a combination of reasons as to why that has been the case. I think there has been some examples of Joe "missing" on guys. I also think there has been examples of misuse, poor development, and confidence problems which has resulted in guys, fairly or unfairly, being jettisoned to the bench or out of the program.

2) Joe failed to identify the change in recruiting related to realistically available players. Thinking about the players Joe was "linked" to and they "just missed" out on over the last few years. All big fish. And to be clear, there's NOTHING wrong with going after big fish. But Joe had to recognize that the likelihood of landing those guys given the dynamic change with the portal and immediate eligibility after transferring was slim and none. He never recognized that. And that blunder resulted in them getting the third-rate guys in the portal to round out their roster.

I know there is youth on this roster. I have read some of the optimism for some of the individual players. But the reality is that all of these guys won't be back, and nothing I've seen from Joe tells me that he is capable of filling the roster with better players in this new world of recruiting.

Right now, I think IUP is closer to the bottom of the league than the top of it. I don't know when they'll compete within the region again, but I doubt Joe Lombardi will be coaching them when they do.

[IUPbigINDIANS]

Has Joe ever missed the PSAC tournament?

Likely. His first team was God awful.

[Fightingscot82]

Has Joe ever missed the PSAC tournament?

[IUPalum]

IUP goes 1-3 in these last 4 games and misses the PSAC's. Joe better then do a little house cleaning and clean up this mess he created. Getting Dallis and Bautista added to this bunch isn't enough.

They need upgrades from Sarp and Pickens.

How does Triggs fit, if at all.

Moore, Merraro, Dallis should be the starting guards.

Grove, Brooks, Bautista... two of those 3 should start at the forwards.

[IUPbigINDIANS]

For those (few) still following along ...


Vegas certainly wouldn't have the odds in favor of Redshirt Joe making the PSAC Tournament.

at Seton Hill
Slippery Rock
California
at Clarion

The killer, obviously, is IUP has lost (3) recent games by (5) points or less. That likely sealed its fate ... but, you never know. The path, however, is tough.

The trip to Greensburg will be a huge challenge. IUP beat the Griffins in Indiana (on a walk-off trey). That will be a whole different environment down there -- and, IUP doesn't play well on the road.

At minimum, this team needs to win Saturday. Don't be the team to snap the streak (SRU hasn't won in Indiana since 1991). Make no mistake, SRU walloped IUP in Morrow. But, we've seen this movie many times.

The last two are toss-ups. I like IUP's chances in both. Joe barely lost to Danny in the Angelo Dome, and Danny won't get all those calls in the KCAC. By the time they make the Friday night trip to Clarion, that game will either mean everything or nothing (for both).

It goes without saying Wednesday's trip to the Yellow Shoebox is a playoff game for IUP. Win that one and see what happens.

IUP has four chances left to finally put a full game together. They can't have these constant lapses if they want to beat any of these four remaining teams. In particular, IUP's 3-PT defense continues to be horrendous. It's killing them. Game. After. Game.

[tonyc]

Saturday's Edinboro-IUP game story: https://open.substack.com/pub/tonyco...meOnShare=true

[IUPbigINDIANS]

Men's game, IUP gave a good fight. Edinboro is right now just older, bigger, better and deeper. Easy equation. A Round 3 could be entertaining. But, IUP may not get invited. Lot of work to do.


Women's game was nuts. IUP's comeback was pretty epic. Great atmosphere and crowd.

[IUPbigINDIANS]

Underground lines today:

IUP Women -2.5

IUP Men +9.5

[IUPbigINDIANS]

So many teams live and die by the three-pointer now. That's why it was so weird to see Ship beat a West Chester team that made 15 three-pointers on Wednesday. That happened partially because the Rams had a better shooting percentage from the three-point line than they did on two-point shots. Another strange stat in that game is that Ship has a higher shooting percentage from the field than for free throws, missing 13 FTs. Free throws have been an adventure for the Raiders all year. As for IUP and UPJ, defense seems to vary wildly in the league from game to game this year. Funny thing is that Ship had its best free-throw game of the year against UPJ, making 15 of 16, and — UPJ made 17 of 18. They just didn't miss the night they played Ship. They are a team you have to guard.

Joe wouldn't come out of this worthless press the other night. UPJ sliced and diced it.

I actually don't know why IUP just doesn't go to a basic zone the rest of the season. It's can't hurt. Joe's never had a team this bad defensively. That's usually the IUP bread and butter.

[Ship69]

We're going to see what kind of character this team has tomorrow.

They aren't playing well. Edinboro hammered them last month.

However, IUP does play pretty well at home.

Joe is 9-2 in the KCAC. He's 2-10 away from it. That is a wild split.

There's no secret formula to this Scots' team. They launch. All game. Edinboro has the second-most 3-PT attempts in the league (674 in 23 games). That's just under 30 attempts per. They also make a whole lot of them -- hitting 36.5% on the season.

Like just about every team this season, they lit up IUP from the outside -- hitting a whopping 13 of 24 (54.2%).

It's real clear the nights they aren't hitting from deep -- they generally lose. The stats are clear as day.

Now, the conundrum, of course, is IUP is perhaps the worst team in the league at defending the 3-PT shot.

In the first meeting, Edinboro was getting clean looks with no IUP defenders within 6' to 8' of them.

Adding to the spice, IUP's defense in Johnstown was perhaps its worst ever under Joe Lombardi. Tony said he could have scored in that game against IUP. I think he'd have went for 12 points and 10 boards.

"Home" IUP and 'Road" IUP are very, very different teams. Joe's clearly a home dog tomorrow. I do, however, suspect Round 2 to be much closer. IUP is due for a good game. It's been awhile.

No sugar coating it ... they pretty much got b!tch-slapped in McComb. Let's see if they have a little fight in them.

So many teams live and die by the three-pointer now. That's why it was so weird to see Ship beat a West Chester team that made 15 three-pointers on Wednesday. That happened partially because the Rams had a better shooting percentage from the three-point line than they did on two-point shots. Another strange stat in that game is that Ship has a higher shooting percentage from the field than for free throws, missing 13 FTs. Free throws have been an adventure for the Raiders all year. As for IUP and UPJ, defense seems to vary wildly in the league from game to game this year. Funny thing is that Ship had its best free-throw game of the year against UPJ, making 15 of 16, and — UPJ made 17 of 18. They just didn't miss the night they played Ship. They are a team you have to guard.

[IUPbigINDIANS]

We're going to see what kind of character this team has tomorrow.

They aren't playing well. Edinboro hammered them last month.

However, IUP does play pretty well at home.

Joe is 9-2 in the KCAC. He's 2-10 away from it. That is a wild split.

There's no secret formula to this Scots' team. They launch. All game. Edinboro has the second-most 3-PT attempts in the league (674 in 23 games). That's just under 30 attempts per. They also make a whole lot of them -- hitting 36.5% on the season.

Like just about every team this season, they lit up IUP from the outside -- hitting a whopping 13 of 24 (54.2%).

It's real clear the nights they aren't hitting from deep -- they generally lose. The stats are clear as day.

Now, the conundrum, of course, is IUP is perhaps the worst team in the league at defending the 3-PT shot.

In the first meeting, Edinboro was getting clean looks with no IUP defenders within 6' to 8' of them.

Adding to the spice, IUP's defense in Johnstown was perhaps its worst ever under Joe Lombardi. Tony said he could have scored in that game against IUP. I think he'd have went for 12 points and 10 boards.

"Home" IUP and 'Road" IUP are very, very different teams. Joe's clearly a home dog tomorrow. I do, however, suspect Round 2 to be much closer. IUP is due for a good game. It's been awhile.

No sugar coating it ... they pretty much got b!tch-slapped in McComb. Let's see if they have a little fight in them.

[Fightingscot82]

Well, you're opening a can of worms.

All I can tell you is Joe is not retiring. Do I think he's 'checked out' of this season? Yes. However, he knows they are going to make a big push the next two years. He's A) not going out like this, and B) not walking away from what he'll have next November.

We'll see. He's seemed disinterested for a few seasons.

[IUPbigINDIANS]

Dude is crispy & fried. He doesn't care. I'm surprised he isn't just sitting in the chair staring at his phone during games. Maybe all the pacing gets him the steps he needs for the health insurance premium discount. If he didn't have the power he has, he'd be "retiring" at season's end.

Well, you're opening a can of worms.

All I can tell you is Joe is not retiring. Do I think he's 'checked out' of this season? Yes. However, he knows they are going to make a big push the next two years. He's A) not going out like this, and B) not walking away from what he'll have next November.

[Fightingscot82]

Speaking of quotes, in Tony’s article Joe said:

“I’m not upset with the loss at all,” Lombardi said. “I know some things we could have done better, but every coach has that after every game. We just didn’t make shots, but I don’t want to blame it on shot-making. There are a lot of fundamentals we don’t have secured yet on both ends of the floor.”

I don’t know what to think of it. I can’t say I’ve ever been in any competition as a coach or player when I wasn’t upset with a loss whether it was checkers or football. I think you can find ways to accept a loss and draw positives from it, but to not be upset with it is curious. I used to listen to Joe’s post-game interviews closely and frankly, I learned a lot from them. I don’t recognize what I’ve been hearing.

Dude is crispy & fried. He doesn't care. I'm surprised he isn't just sitting in the chair staring at his phone during games. Maybe all the pacing gets him the steps he needs for the health insurance premium discount. If he didn't have the power he has, he'd be "retiring" at season's end.

[EyeoftheHawk]

Speaking of quotes, in Tony’s article Joe said:

“I’m not upset with the loss at all,” Lombardi said. “I know some things we could have done better, but every coach has that after every game. We just didn’t make shots, but I don’t want to blame it on shot-making. There are a lot of fundamentals we don’t have secured yet on both ends of the floor.”

I don’t know what to think of it. I can’t say I’ve ever been in any competition as a coach or player when I wasn’t upset with a loss whether it was checkers or football. I think you can find ways to accept a loss and draw positives from it, but to not be upset with it is curious. I used to listen to Joe’s post-game interviews closely and frankly, I learned a lot from them. I don’t recognize what I’ve been hearing.