Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Iup basketball

Collapse

Support The Site!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Chuck Norris
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post

    It was almost a mirror image of the second game against Gannon. Joe's team was toast 5 minutes in to the second half. Fatigue leads to horrendous play.

    As for your last comment, we don't want 'everybody' to stick around. He needs to do a little housecleaning to free up some money they could better spend.

    The best news this morning is the next game IUP plays it will have Dallis and Bautista.

    You can't win a gun fight with a couple knives. That's what he tried to do in Erie last night.

    I don't think he'll retire. He knows they can bounce back real quick next year. But, something he's doing needs to change. That was humiliating last night. He can't figure anything out to deal with that pressure. Their inbounding plays are terrible. They are too slow. He doesn't bring enough help up. It's just a total freaking mess.

    I knew they'd lose last night, but I was expecting Gannon to win by 12-15. Eating a 30 Burger wasn't on the menu.





    Yeah, everybody was the wrong word to use. I meant the freshmen and handful of other key guys.

    I hope they bounce back next year. The new world of college athletics will always give me pause though. Guys can wake up one morning in a certain mood and be gone. But I’m hopeful. IUP not being good has really killed my interest in D2 basketball as a whole, not to mention having to pay to watch the regional but that’s a whole other discussion lol. I want to get back into it next year.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUP24
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPalum View Post

    Yeah, what you just said makes zero sense when both Dallis and Bautista have been interviewed a handful of times and said they are going to be at IUP.
    That's fine. And I know what they said. But nothing surprises me anymore regarding what a bunch of 18-23 year olds decide to do when they are playing college athletics. If we are taking them at their word that they are going to be back, that's real risky business to just assume that given the nature of college athletics today. But anyone is free to have a differing perspective on the matter.

    I hope they Dallis comes back and I hope he dominates. I hope Bautista plays and is as electric of a player as we have been told he is. I just won't count on either variable until I see them in uniform to open up next season.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPalum
    replied
    Originally posted by IUP24 View Post

    I'm happy this is all over and we can move onto next year. Whatever that means and whatever that may look like.

    The unpopular opinion that I am going to present is that I'm not even remotely counting on Dallis Dillard to be a significant difference maker. He hasn't played meaningful minutes, for any extended stretch, for two full years now. There is no guarantee that he is the difference maker we are all hoping (thinking) he will be after being away like that. Thinking that he is the key cog in putting this program back into legitimate regional conversations and beyond is fool's gold, in my opinion. To be honest, I'm not even sure he comes back. He's been with the program a while, has struggled staying healthy and going through some of the rehab things. He might transfer elsewhere for a fresh start where he did not have the injury problems (a lot of guys do that after a long rehab process). He also just might not believe basketball is his identity anymore and simply move on with his life. I've seen that before too.

    I'm also not considering Bautista part of next year's unit until he steps on the court for the first time. He's just another name in the growing list of track suit legends. Is he the next Cobo Diaz? Or is he another Romero-Sanz that never plays a minute? Nothing says it can't be the latter. And until he's on the floor, I am not penciling him a part of the team based on recent track record of Joe missing on these guys, or not managing their situations correctly.

    Perhaps I'm offering a pessimistic view, but the program fell off a cliff. Quickly. Is that all Joe's fault? No. They've had some bad luck for sure. But the symptoms around a lot of the issues we've discussed over the last 2-3 years aren't related to luck, either. They've recruited poorly. Not developed guys. Had guys never play. Had players unexpectedly leave their program. Something within the program needs fixed to address those things. I'm not offering any solutions or identifying the root cause, rather just making an observer's comment on the matter.

    Their social media accounts used to post about the annual #QuestForTheWest. Now they are celebrating making the conference tournament with a losing record. How do you get back to 26-3, or something like that? I'm certain that having Dillard and Clarke would have helped be better than 14-16. But I'm not sure they would have been threatening the top players in the regional conversation this year based on what I saw from the rest of the supporting cast this year. There were some flashes, but not enough to say that the collective unit would have been "great" in terms of the big picture.

    West Liberty doesn't have full rebuilding years like this. They just retool and replace every single year. And that's what IUP used to do too. That magic just isn't there anymore. Again, I'm not offering the solutions or presenting the root cause. But something is just "off" within the entire program. I get it's a different world now, but many of their top competitors within the regional conversation have seemingly figured it out. How a program with the facilities, following, tradition, and support structure - like IUP - hasn't been able to put it together is alarming on a number of levels.
    Yeah, what you just said makes zero sense when both Dallis and Bautista have been interviewed a handful of times and said they are going to be at IUP. Also, Joe has said numerous times that Dallis has been practicing and dominates the team at practice. Bautista will play but the mystery is, will he be as good as they say? That we'll have to wait and see.

    We DON'T want everyone back. Joe has some house cleaning to do. Hopefully he has the set of balls to do it instead of praying to God and hoping some of these guys play better.

    We already know Callum and Denzel are gone. That's two spots to beef up the roster. I think a couple other need to go also. I won't mention names yet!

    Leave a comment:


  • IUP24
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post

    It was almost a mirror image of the second game against Gannon. Joe's team was toast 5 minutes in to the second half. Fatigue leads to horrendous play.

    As for your last comment, we don't want 'everybody' to stick around. He needs to do a little housecleaning to free up some money they could better spend.

    The best news this morning is the next game IUP plays it will have Dallis and Bautista.

    You can't win a gun fight with a couple knives. That's what he tried to do in Erie last night.

    I don't think he'll retire. He knows they can bounce back real quick next year. But, something he's doing needs to change. That was humiliating last night. He can't figure anything out to deal with that pressure. Their inbounding plays are terrible. They are too slow. He doesn't bring enough help up. It's just a total freaking mess.

    I knew they'd lose last night, but I was expecting Gannon to win by 12-15. Eating a 30 Burger wasn't on the menu.

    I'm happy this is all over and we can move onto next year. Whatever that means and whatever that may look like.

    The unpopular opinion that I am going to present is that I'm not even remotely counting on Dallis Dillard to be a significant difference maker. He hasn't played meaningful minutes, for any extended stretch, for two full years now. There is no guarantee that he is the difference maker we are all hoping (thinking) he will be after being away like that. Thinking that he is the key cog in putting this program back into legitimate regional conversations and beyond is fool's gold, in my opinion. To be honest, I'm not even sure he comes back. He's been with the program a while, has struggled staying healthy and going through some of the rehab things. He might transfer elsewhere for a fresh start where he did not have the injury problems (a lot of guys do that after a long rehab process). He also just might not believe basketball is his identity anymore and simply move on with his life. I've seen that before too.

    I'm also not considering Bautista part of next year's unit until he steps on the court for the first time. He's just another name in the growing list of track suit legends. Is he the next Cobo Diaz? Or is he another Romero-Sanz that never plays a minute? Nothing says it can't be the latter. And until he's on the floor, I am not penciling him a part of the team based on recent track record of Joe missing on these guys, or not managing their situations correctly.

    Perhaps I'm offering a pessimistic view, but the program fell off a cliff. Quickly. Is that all Joe's fault? No. They've had some bad luck for sure. But the symptoms around a lot of the issues we've discussed over the last 2-3 years aren't related to luck, either. They've recruited poorly. Not developed guys. Had guys never play. Had players unexpectedly leave their program. Something within the program needs fixed to address those things. I'm not offering any solutions or identifying the root cause, rather just making an observer's comment on the matter.

    Their social media accounts used to post about the annual #QuestForTheWest. Now they are celebrating making the conference tournament with a losing record. How do you get back to 26-3, or something like that? I'm certain that having Dillard and Clarke would have helped be better than 14-16. But I'm not sure they would have been threatening the top players in the regional conversation this year based on what I saw from the rest of the supporting cast this year. There were some flashes, but not enough to say that the collective unit would have been "great" in terms of the big picture.

    West Liberty doesn't have full rebuilding years like this. They just retool and replace every single year. And that's what IUP used to do too. That magic just isn't there anymore. Again, I'm not offering the solutions or presenting the root cause. But something is just "off" within the entire program. I get it's a different world now, but many of their top competitors within the regional conversation have seemingly figured it out. How a program with the facilities, following, tradition, and support structure - like IUP - hasn't been able to put it together is alarming on a number of levels.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPbigINDIANS
    replied
    Originally posted by Chuck Norris View Post
    I thought the door was open for IUP to make a game of it in the first 12-14 minutes, but they couldn’t hit the broad side of barn. Once Gannon got rolling they put an end to any drama pretty quickly. On to next year. Hopefully everybody sticks around.
    It was almost a mirror image of the second game against Gannon. Joe's team was toast 5 minutes in to the second half. Fatigue leads to horrendous play.

    As for your last comment, we don't want 'everybody' to stick around. He needs to do a little housecleaning to free up some money they could better spend.

    The best news this morning is the next game IUP plays it will have Dallis and Bautista.

    You can't win a gun fight with a couple knives. That's what he tried to do in Erie last night.

    I don't think he'll retire. He knows they can bounce back real quick next year. But, something he's doing needs to change. That was humiliating last night. He can't figure anything out to deal with that pressure. Their inbounding plays are terrible. They are too slow. He doesn't bring enough help up. It's just a total freaking mess.

    I knew they'd lose last night, but I was expecting Gannon to win by 12-15. Eating a 30 Burger wasn't on the menu.






    Last edited by IUPbigINDIANS; 03-06-2025, 07:44 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUP24
    replied
    For better or for worse, thank goodness that - the "most satisfying coaching job" of Joe's career - is over.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chuck Norris
    replied
    I thought the door was open for IUP to make a game of it in the first 12-14 minutes, but they couldn’t hit the broad side of barn. Once Gannon got rolling they put an end to any drama pretty quickly. On to next year. Hopefully everybody sticks around.

    Leave a comment:


  • WarriorVoice
    replied
    Originally posted by Ship69 View Post

    Bizarre does not even begin to cover this season. I expected Shepherd to use their massive size advantage to beat Ship on Monday. Instead the Rams, not a particularly sharpshooting bunch during the season, blitzed the Raiders with 17 three-pointers to blow open the game. It worked for the Rams last night, but if I'm one of their future opponents I'd be glad to see them continue the outside shooting strategy.
    Shepherd takes over 40% of their shots from beyond the arc, 3rd highest rate in the conference. I did the math last night. To your point, they are 13th in the PSAC in 3FG%...
    Last edited by WarriorVoice; 03-05-2025, 05:52 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • tonyc
    replied
    Up next: https://open.substack.com/pub/tonyco...meOnShare=true

    Leave a comment:


  • Ship69
    replied
    Originally posted by EyeoftheHawk View Post

    I’m happy to be wrong that I couldn’t see a way for the IUP men to win. Then when they went down so big at the start I thought the floodgates would open. I have to go back and watch the end because I shut it off when IUP went up big in the 2nd half. I was surprised to see the final. Once Rock got behind they lost composure and went all playground ball while IUP just continued to do its thing. Rock has been an odd team this year with long winning and losing streaks. Seton Hill also won. What a bizarre year in the conference.
    Bizarre does not even begin to cover this season. I expected Shepherd to use their massive size advantage to beat Ship on Monday. Instead the Rams, not a particularly sharpshooting bunch during the season, blitzed the Raiders with 17 three-pointers to blow open the game. It worked for the Rams last night, but if I'm one of their future opponents I'd be glad to see them continue the outside shooting strategy.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPalum
    replied
    Originally posted by Chuck Norris View Post
    Let’s give Sarp some credit for the massive rebound of the missed free throw at the end. If he doesn’t snag that SRU is down one and has time to get to the rim.

    A great effort to avoid a three game sweep at the hands of a hated rival.
    I'll give him credit but let's take notice of the lack of box out by SRU and the fortunate bounce that came right to him.

    Leave a comment:


  • IUPbigINDIANS
    replied
    Originally posted by Chuck Norris View Post
    Let’s give Sarp some credit for the massive rebound of the missed free throw at the end. If he doesn’t snag that SRU is down one and has time to get to the rim.

    A great effort to avoid a three game sweep at the hands of a hated rival.

    I did last night but it was actually in the PSAC West thread. Yes, that was a huge play.

    My wish, however, is for the IUP teams (men's and women's) to just make some freaking FTs and eliminate the drama at the end of these games. Both of those wins could have been sealed long before they actually were. Joe's team shot a dismal 61.9% from the the line last night. The ladies shot an even worse 55.6%. It's amazing both could shoot that poor and still win. Neither has much of a bench, so fatigue certainly contributes.

    Both teams should have been in cruise control the final couple minutes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chuck Norris
    replied
    Let’s give Sarp some credit for the massive rebound of the missed free throw at the end. If he doesn’t snag that SRU is down one and has time to get to the rim.

    A great effort to avoid a three game sweep at the hands of a hated rival.

    Leave a comment:


  • EyeoftheHawk
    replied
    Originally posted by IUPbigINDIANS View Post
    IUP men and women got some serious payback tonight.

    Men's game was crazy. Huge win for this team.
    I’m happy to be wrong that I couldn’t see a way for the IUP men to win. Then when they went down so big at the start I thought the floodgates would open. I have to go back and watch the end because I shut it off when IUP went up big in the 2nd half. I was surprised to see the final. Once Rock got behind they lost composure and went all playground ball while IUP just continued to do its thing. Rock has been an odd team this year with long winning and losing streaks. Seton Hill also won. What a bizarre year in the conference.

    Leave a comment:


  • tonyc
    replied
    IUP win at Slippery Rock: https://open.substack.com/pub/tonyco...meOnShare=true

    Leave a comment:

Ad3

Collapse
Working...
X